Menu
header photo

Creation Science Fiction™

Exposing The Lies One Layer At A Time

WILLIAM H. LUDLOW v. GARY P. ROBOKOFF IN FEDERAL COURT, 2018

NOTE: Gary Robokoff has continually denied he has any Judgment of Fraud against him. There were two separate cases, one for Trade Name and one for Trademark. Proceeding # 91243350 for Trade Name and proceeding #91243373 for Trademark (logo). Both cases may be seen by searching the USPTO database and entering the proceeding number at the link below.  
 

http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/

 

In the Trade Name case, Gary Robokoff attempted to withdraw his application after the opposition was filed. Because he did not follow proper rules of procedure and get permission from the plaintiff, a Judgment was ordered in favor of the plaintiff.  In the Trademark case, Gary Robokoff never filed a response. After the time to file a response expired, a Judgment was issued against him in that case too. The Opposition contained allegations of Fraud Against The United States Patent And Trademark Office and they are outlined below. The Opposition was sustained and the Plaintiff Bill Ludlow won both cases.  Because the Oppositions were sustained and they contained allegations of Fraud, Gary Robokoff now has two Judgments of Fraud Against The USPTO against him. 

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

alt

 

Judgment In Favor Of William H. Ludlow

alt

alt